{"id":17408,"date":"2017-09-18T16:48:19","date_gmt":"2017-09-18T21:48:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/?p=17408"},"modified":"2018-01-24T10:01:47","modified_gmt":"2018-01-24T15:01:47","slug":"dont-get-ripped-off-part-8-how-much-does-this-lens-really-cost-224-50-2-99","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/?p=17408","title":{"rendered":"The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Eight. How much does this lens really cost? $224.50? $2.99?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>The ads for these smart phone telephoto lenses keep popping up on Facebook and elsewhere online. How much do they really cost and why do the prices vary so much?<\/p>\n

Posted Sep. 18, 2017. Expanded Dec. 2, 2017.<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It all starts in China where these lenses are made.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Wholesalers sell them in various quantities and prices to whoever wants to buy them. You can find a lot of wholesale distributors at Global Sources<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 This particular Chinese wholesaler sells these lenses for $2.95 each provided you buy at least 1,000 of them, a total order of $2,950.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Some people want to buy and resell these lenses but they don’t want to buy in such big quantities. So they go to secondary wholesalers. You can find secondary wholesalers at DHgate<\/a>. This particular secondary wholesaler will sell you 20 of these lenses at $5.80 each, a total order of $116.00.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>At this point companies (which could be as small as one person) sell these to the public. They make up a fancy name for the lens (or no name at all) and sell it to the public for whatever price they want. Here are just a few random prices on Google.<\/p>\n

Few people would expert to get a super high quality lens if they are paying under $10. Most people would guess it is a cheap, plastic lens that might be fun to play with.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>The problem comes in when someone wants to sell these lenses for $56, $59.95, or $224.50. Now they have to convince the public that these lenses are really something special. In other words, they mislead people. So you see a picture of the moon that is impossible for one of these cheap Chinese lenses to take. Of course these people are clever. They don’t actually say the moon on the smart phone screen was taken with the lens pictured on the phone, but they want you to think that.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>They grab a photo of a model off the internet and tell you he is a German engineer. He isn’t of course. The whole German engineer thing is fake. I know this because I tracked down the photographer that took the photo. You can read the whole strange story here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

They also grab photos off the internet that were created with professional photography equipment and use them in their ads\/articles that promote these cheap Chinese lenses. They don’t actually say the photos were taken with the smart phone lenses they are selling. They just do their best to give you that impression. They steal these photos from professional photographers without their knowledge and permission. I know this because I talked to the photographers who had their photos stolen and used in these bogus ads. I give several examples in this article<\/a> as well as some of the other articles in this series.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Lens comparison chart.<\/p><\/div>\n

And of course they show you a chart proving their lenses are better than professional lenses from the major manufacturers.<\/p>\n

No experienced photographer would believe this nonsense.<\/p>\n

But people who don’t understand photography have no idea. So all of a sudden a cheap Chinese lens that started out costing $2.99 is now selling on the internet for $224.50.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

12X telephoto camera phone lens vs DSLR and zoom lens.
Bottom: Canon 7D Mk II, Canon 100-400mm Mk
II, Canon 1.4X Mk III. File: 170915-7D2-8408.<\/p><\/div>\n

And the worst news is that these lenses are poor in quality. You can read all about it here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

As for the price of $224.50 at the top of this page. I couldn’t believe my eyes. I’ve seen prices as high as $116, but never this high. I thought maybe if I clicked on the link they would take 75% off.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>So I clicked on the ADD TO CART button and got this page (above). Still $224.50.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>So I clicked the CHECK OUT button and got this page. Still $224.50. This was where I stopped. No way was I going to give them my personal information.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>And here is the real kicker. I clicked on a different Facebook ad and ended up at this page where the price is only, hold your breath, $29.00. Same site. Same lens. Seriously different prices. The price you get depends entirely on which teaser ad you click that sends you to the HD Zoom Pro site. Strange.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Despite all the flaws in this telephoto lens, if you really want to buy one out of curiosity, go to eBay where you can buy it for as little as $2.99.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Or go to Amazon. You can buy this telephoto lens as a set with three other lenses (you also get a fisheye, wide angle, and macro lenses). Go here<\/a>. Prices fluctuate. A few days ago this same set was $14.98. Don’t forget, I warned you the quality is poor.<\/p>\n

You can find much better smart phone lenses at the links below.<\/p>\n

Links<\/strong><\/p>\n

Series Overview
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off Series \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Overpriced Camera Phone Lenses<\/a><\/p>\n

Series Links<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part One<\/a><\/p>\n

Same Guy, Several Different Names, Several Different Ads, Several Different Products \u00e2\u20ac\u201c The fake German engineer used in the Chinese lens rip off ads<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Two<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Three<\/a><\/p>\n

How Many Identities Can One Man Have Before You Get Suspicious? Would you Believe 17?\u00c2\u00a0<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Another fake German engineer used in the Chinese lens rip off ads.<\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Four<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Five. The fascinating story of cheap, Chinese camera phone lenses.<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Six. Video: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Does It Suck?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Seven. Comparison test: telephoto phone lens vs DLSR and zoom lens<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Eight. How much does this lens really cost? $224.50? $2.99?<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off! Part Nine. Comparison Test Two: 8-18X Telephoto Phone Lens vs 12X Telephoto Phone Lens<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off Series, Part Ten. Good Luck Trying to Get a Refund<\/a><\/p>\n

The Chinese Lens Rip Off Series, Part Eleven. The Same Lousy Lens With Many Different Names<\/a><\/p>\n

How to Choose the Best iPhone Lenses<\/a><\/p>\n

More Links<\/strong><\/p>\n

The best iPhone lens kit<\/a><\/p>\n

The best lenses for iPhone photography<\/a><\/p>\n

Apexel Set of Four Camera Phone Lenses<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c This is the set of lenses I bought at Amazon\u00c2\u00a0 to test these cheap, poor quality lenses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The ads for these smart phone telephoto lenses keep popping up on Facebook and elsewhere online. How much do they really cost and why do the prices vary so much? Posted Sep. 18, 2017. Expanded Dec. 2, 2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,30,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-iphone-photography","category-lenses"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17408"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17408\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18993,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17408\/revisions\/18993"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.jimdoty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}